The Friction Project đ

The Friction project collects strategies for removing and adding friction so organisations function better.
Here are some choice cuts.
Why friction is good and bad
We soon learned that the goal of becoming a âfrictionless organizationâ is misguided. Yes, the people who run most organizations create too much debilitating friction. But many also ignore the opposite side of the coin, making the wrong things too easy for employees and customers.
âŚ
The harder we humans work at something, and the more we suffer, the more we come to value it (independent of its objective value) because of our need to justify all that work to ourselves and others.
A trustee of other’s time
In August 1940, as his country prepared for waves of attacks by German planes, Winston Churchill set out to address a different enemy. In his 234-word âBrevityâ memo, 1 he implored his colleagues to âsee to it that their Reports are shorter.â The British prime minister urged them to write âshort, crisp paragraphs,â to move complex arguments or statistics to appendices, and to stop using âofficialese jargonâ and âwoolly phrases.â A few months later, Churchill asked bureaucrats to hear his âcry of painâ and remember that âthe number and length of messages sent by a diplomat are no measure of his efficiency.â
âŚ
Rohm and Haas teaches its leaders that when they face a decision with broad and enduring consequences, taking speedy, narrow, and impulsive action is a recipe for disaster. Instead, Rohm and Haas preaches the Five Voices method. Before making a big decision, leaders slow down, do careful research, and talk to people until they understand five key stakeholders: the customer, the employee, the owner, the community, and the process.
âŚ
âThere comes a point where we need to stop just pulling people out of the river. We need to go upstream and find out why theyâre falling in.â
Overcoming power poisoning
If you are more powerful than your colleagues or customers, you are at risk of being clueless about their friction troubles, and of how you add to their misery. Beware of such power poisoning.
âŚ
âIf you are the HIPPO, donât be a hippo, be an elephant.â
i.e. have big ears rather than a big mouth.
âŚ
The lesson, and perhaps the irony, of Tsedal and Sebastianâs study is that executives who deferred to subordinates moved up the pecking order faster than those who refused to bend to their underlingsâ will and wisdom: Leaders were granted more power because they gave it away.
âŚ
After Lindyâs team analyzed more than a hundred hours of observations and sixty interviews from ten start-ups, they found the best CEOs shifted between accentuating and flattening the hierarchyâand the worst ones treated the hierarchy as static.
When one CEO was asked if her team was flat or hierarchical, she explained, âYou have to have both. If you donât have that flat piece where youâre taking everyoneâs input, youâre dropping expertise on the table, and if you donât have a hierarchical piece, then youâre just heading in all different directions.â The best leaders âactivatedâ their authority to squelch destructive conflict, when discussion and debate became repetitive, and time pressure necessitated immediate decisions. These flexible leaders âflattenedâ the hierarchy when creativity, problem-solving, and buy-in were top priorities.
Using subtraction to remove friction
People tend to add stuff to their work environments.
One of the more effective ways of removing destructive organisational friction is to instead subtract things.
Techniques for repairing coordination snafus
Onboard People to the Organization, Not Just the Job â Friction fixers who are intent on building a culture of coordination go beyond training newcomers to perform their narrow job responsibilities. They teach newbies how their work meshes with that of others, how the organization functions, and how to use the system to help them do their work. This saves a lot of trouble down the road.
âŚ
Build Roles and Teams Dedicated to Integration â The idea here is to create specialists in your organization who are charged with integrating the once-disconnected roles, silos, and action. The Cancer Center created a centralized CarePoint program to reduce the cancer tax for patients and their families. CarePoint administrators use their knowledge and relationships to smooth patient journeys, and when problems arise, patients and families have a place to turn for help.
âŚ
Fix Handoffs â Bungled information exchanges between people in different roles, silos, shifts, and time zones are among the most potent causes of coordination snafus.
Applying good friction
Anthropologists and sociologists document how, when something ends, people benefit from pausing to reflect on the past, what theyâve lost, what comes next, and what matters most and least to themâand to support one another. Be it the end of a meeting, a day, a game, a career, a life, a team, a project, or an organization.
âŚ
Patty McCord, who was Netflixâs chief talent officer for the companyâs first fourteen years, told us, âThe most important role I played at Netflix was, at the end of every executive meeting, to say, âHave we made any decisions in the room today, and if we have, how are we going to communicate them?ââ
Leading friction fixing
The third leadership principle is organizational design is the highest form of friction fixing. Most of the time, leaders donât have the luxury of designing a workplace from scratch. So most must find ways to manage in existing and imperfect systems.