Chad Fowler:

Why are humans allowed to edit the output at all? If you care about provenance—about being able to trace every line of code back to a decision—then manual edits are a problem. They break the chain. They introduce code that has no record, no explanation, no origin you can inspect. So you end up in an uncomfortable place: You don’t just prefer that agents write the code. You require it. Not because agents are better programmers. But because they are the only way to guarantee that every change passes through a process that can be captured, inspected, and replayed. Humans don’t stop participating. They just move up a level. They define intent. They shape constraints. They review outcomes. But they don’t write the code directly anymore. Because the moment they do, the system forgets how it got there.